Page 50 - kpi15431
P. 50

KPI Congress 15 th   4



                            The	wheel-turning	monarch	does	not	resort	to	violence.	Buddhist	texts,	however,
                      give	lengthy	descriptions	of	his	fourfold	army.	It	might	surprise	anyone	if	the	wheel-
                      turning	monarch	does	not	resort	to	violence,	why	he	has	to	maintain	the	fourfold
                      army	(D.II.178;	Rhys	Davids	1989:	209;	D.III.62;	Rhys	Davids	1991:	63;	M.III.172).
                      The	reason	may	be	by	definition	the	wheel-turning	monarch	requires	the	fourfold	army
                      as	his	retinue	denoting	his	accomplishments	as	a	wheel-turner	monarch.	Maintaining
                      an	army	with	multiple	regiments	thus	can	be	seen	as	of	paramount	significance	for
                      the	wheel-turner	monarch.	In	practical	terms	of	governance,	the	interdependence
                      between	temporal	wheel	and	the	spiritual	wheel	may	have	been	taken	into	account
                      here.	In	many	occasions,	the	Buddha	stressed	superiority	of	the	‘right’	over	‘might.’
                      At	the	same	time,	the	Buddha	may	have	recognized	that	the	‘might’	be	required	in
                      order	to	maintain	the	‘right.’	For	any	kind	of	healthy	governance,	proper	measures	and
                      devices	are	required	to	maintain	law	and	order.


                      IV
Initiatives
to
Create
Dharmarãjya
(Just
State)
in

                      Buddhist
Societies



                            The	notion	of	dharmarãjya	undergoes	chronological,	historical	and	doctrinal
                      developments	over	many	centuries	long	after	the	Buddha’s	passing	away.	At	the
                      Buddha’s	time,	though	there	may	have	been	notions	of	justice	and	righteous	kingship,
                      the	idea	of	the	existence	of	a	dharmarãjya	(Just	State)	may	not	have	been
                      conceptualized.	The	reason	also	might	have	been	that	Buddhism	had	not	been
                      developed	extensively	to	deal	with	matters	related	to	politics	and	the	state.	By	and
                      large,	Buddhist	communities	were	operating	outside	and	beyond	the	secular	concerns
                      of	the	state	and	affairs	of	this	worldly	life.	As	a	renunciant	movement,	most	members
                      of	the	Buddhist	community,	neither	monastic	nor	lay,	perhaps	were	interested	in
                      political	matters	and	issues	of	governance.

                            As	historical	evidence	suggests	Buddhists	in	South	Asia,	East	Asia	as	well	as
                      Southeast	Asia	have	been	interested	in	the	notion	of	dharmarãja	for	several	centuries.
                      In	several	Buddhist	lands	including	China,	there	are	stories	of	kings	who	attempted	to
                      get	closer	to	the	ideal	of	Buddhist	kingship	as	narrated	in	Buddhist	texts.


                      	(a)	Early	Developments	of	the	Dharmaraja	Concept:	Emperor	Asoka’s

                            Projection	as	a	Dharmaraja	in	Ancient	India


                            Buddhist	concepts	of	good	governance	and	just	ruler	as	envisaged	by	modern	                   International panel discussion
                      Buddhist	thinkers	have	their	incipient	and	humble	origins	in	the	reign	of	Emperor
                      A oka (c. 300-232 BCE; r. 268-232 BCE), the third ruler of the Mauryan dynasty and
                      the	first	builder	of	an	empire	in	ancient	India.	In	his	inscriptions,	Emperor	A oka
                      introduced	himself	as	“King	Priyadar ĩ,	Beloved	of	the	Gods.”	Both	inscriptions	of
                      Emperor	A oka	and	records	of	the	Sri	Lankan	Pãli	chronicles	support	that	Emperor
                      A oka	adopted	the	dharmarãja	concept	as	the	foundational	principle	of	politics	and
                      good	government.
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55